Sunday, March 29, 2015

excited delirium: a potentially fatal missed symptom

I recently was involved in a death case that was labeled excited delirium and I found that the AMA or the APA do not recognize it as a valid diagnosis. Thinking back to my days when I was first on active duty as a combat medic, I helped restrain and treat a soldier in 1983 when he exhibited the same symptoms from LSD and thought the Viet Cong were coming for him. It took four MPs and three of us from EMS to restrain him long enough to get him sedated. Working as a hospitalist in internal medicine, we see these type patients after ingesting illegal substances to include but not limited to meth, bath salts, etc. The following is my view on this subject.

Excited Delirium: A Potentially Fatal Missed Symptom

The symptoms of excited delirium (ExD) were first noted by Dr. Luther Vose Bell MD in 1849 in the American Journal of Insanity. Dr. Bell noted that some of his patients experienced a sudden onset of; great over activity, marked sleeplessness, great push of speech with statements that are disconnected at times by reason of the rapidity of flow, disconnected and poorly systemized delusions, transient hallucinations that border on illusions, appearance of confusion, but when one insists that the patient answer the questions, the patient can “Suspend the intellectual wanderings” long enough to answer correctly as to orientation. The course of the illness is from three to six weeks, with a fatal termination in a large percentage of patients, apparently from cardio-vascular failure due to over activity. The cases that recover have no after symptoms. No pathological evidence of note has been found by late workers.(6). Dr. Bell recommended sedation and that “Quelled overexcitement” in patients during that time period. These symptoms Dr. Bell described were not written about again until after the discovery of modern antipsychotic drugs. Antipsychotic drugs along with deinstitutionalizing patients were thought to be a contributing factor in the decline of these symptoms.(1). With these new antipsychotic drugs did come an accepted diagnosis that is valid even today in internal medicine and psychiatry and that is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS). It was described in the 1960’s and can be fatal. The one symptom of NMS that is not seen when compared to the symptom list of excited delirium is violent behavior. Actual excited delirium was not written about until in the 1980’s with the surge of cocaine into Florida when Fishbain and Wetli wrote a paper on the delirium and death of a cocaine body packer.(3).  Excited (or agitated) delirium has been characterized by high temperature, agitation, aggression, bizarre behavior and sudden death, often in the custody of law enforcement. Literature review through PubMed reveals that those signs and symptoms that were first stated by Dr. Bell vary to some degree in each article reviewed on excited delirium. It seems that the list has been taken away from (patient is able to suspend intellectual wanderings) and added to (hyperthermia) over the years especially with the surge of cocaine toxicity reports both through the emergency room and in autopsies. Even media attempts to explain the cause and effect of excited delirium have produced a few common symptoms and behaviors that persons exhibit but the science has not proven the exact causal relationship.

Researchers in Miami, FL , have thru out the years published papers attempting to explain ExD. They are now trying to use a 2-protein bio-marker to support their ExD theory in post-autopsy brain samples. The Excited Delirium Organization has some of the same researchers that were involved in several papers that were published from Miami. In 1996, a paper on the resurgence of cocaine and management of “agitated delirium” was published.(8) In 1997, another published paper was on “fatal excited delirium” with cocaine overdose.(8) In 1999, a paper was written on dopamine receptors and alterations of the brain in pre-terminal excited delirium cocaine overdoses. (7). This organization’s website states the forensic biology signature of excited delirium includes deregulated dopamine transporters (hyper dopaminergic state), elevated heat shock protein 70 (hyperthermia) and immediate early gene activation as a marker of paranoid aggression (c-fos protein).(7) In the article Brain Biomarkers for Identifying Excited Delirium as a Cause of Sudden Death(9) Dr. Mash used not only the 2-protein biomarker in their evaluation of post mortem brains but also stated, “When combined” with descriptions (a questionnaire of 22 questions filled out by witnesses after the death of the patient) of the decedent’s behavior, a 2-protein biomarker signature can serve as a reliable forensics tool for identifying the excited delirium syndrome at autopsy.(9) In an exploratory report that the heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) is reliable for identifying excited delirium, this has been refuted by Johnson MM et. al. (20) in that the present data do not support the assertion the HSP70 expression is a reliable brain biomarker for identifying excited delirium as a cause of death.(20). Likewise, in c-fos protein and the exploration of modulation, researchers have shown cause and effectual relationships from amygdala kindling for seizures to evidence that neuronal activation and c-fos induction in the amygdala may be important for mechanisms of fear and anxiety.(19).

 In further reviewing the literature, one study only found 18 of 214 individuals who were identified with (ExD) died while being restrained or taken into custody. (6). In the article Excited Delirium by A. Takeuchi et. al. in their research of the literature they reported that it appeared in all cases that the “victims died of either respiratory arrest or fatal cardiac dysrhythmia. (17). Those diagnoses were supported by postmortem exams showing pulmonary and cerebral edema with nonlethal self-inflicted injuries. (17). They also concluded that victims of ExD “usually die from cardiopulmonary arrest, although the exact cause of such an arrest is likely multifactorial.”(5,10,13,15). The prone maximal restraint position (PMRP) or ‘hog-tying” as know to law enforcement has been reported along with knee to the back and back of the head. (10,12) Along with coroner’s reports has supported the diagnosis of positional asphyxia.(10,11). In articles by Chan et.al.(2) they tried to debunk this theory by exploring the effect PRMP on ventilitory capacity and arterial blood gases. They used fifteen healthy male volunteers, added 25-50  lbs, …. They did not use obese subjects, subjects with pre-existing medical problems, actively resisting with more than one person sitting on them or actively restraining them in the prone position and let them have a break to sit up. The studies validity would have to be questioned if you are comparing what happens in real agitated delirium scenarios. Another report documents 18 fatal ExD cases with 13 primary cardiac rhythms confirmed by emergency personnel.(17). In the article by MS Pollanen et. al.(17) the authors reviewed the records of 21 cases of unexpected death in people with ExD, which were investigated in the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario between 1988-1995. The results showed that in all 21 cases their deaths were associated with restraints and either prone or subjected to pressure to the neck.(17).  

The National Association of Medical Examiners (NAMES) and the American College of Emergency Physicians with their White Paper Report on Excited Delirium Syndrome of 2009 (1) have supported this diagnosis by placing or endorsing its placement on the patients chart/death certificate. (1). As early as 2003 the NAACP argued that excited delirium is used to explain the deaths of minorities more often than whites.(1). In 2007 Eric Balaban of the American Civil Liberties Union argued that excited delirium is not recognized by the American Medical Association or the American Psychological Association and the diagnosis only served as a “Means of white-washing what may be excessive force and inappropriate use of control techniques by officers during an arrest.” (1). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV has multiple diagnosis already established such as substance induced psychosis. It is not a new diagnosis but a manifestation of certain drugs that can cause symptoms that is seen. Diseases such as thyrotoxicosis, neuro malignant syndrome, hyperglycemia, etc. can show symptoms similar to the ones seen in "ExD".

In 2003-2007 NPR, the Los Angeles Times and ABC News did stories about deaths being caused by excited delirium and what did that really mean.(14). Even in 2012 in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Tanya A. Martin versus City of Broadview and the Broadview Police Department, Dr. Frank Miller III the Cuyahoga County Coroner gave the cause of death as excited delirium from LSD and cardiopulmonary arrest. Dr. Stanley Seligman the forensic pathologist who conducted Martin’s autopsy concluded that the evidence pointed to asphyxia as the cause of death. Dr. Werner Spiz a pathologist hired by the estate “criticized the coroner’s cause of death determination, stating that excited delirium is a controversial, unproven, and unrecognized theory from which no death has ever resulted”.

What should be done with when you encounter a person with symptoms of excited delirium? If they are not hurting themselves or someone else, take time to try and contain them while waiting for backup. Get EMS enroute on any suspected problem call like this. The most pressing problem is getting that person sedated and to an emergency room. Chemical sedation is the fastest and safest treatment for people with these type of symptoms for public and subject safety. Only restrain with the amount of force needed long enough to let the sedation take effect. Once double cuffed with the legs restrained, roll them on their side as quickly as possible out of the prone position. The prone position especially with the weight of people on top of the subject restricts the chest in respiration resulting in hypoxia. Hypoxia along with the adrenalin cascade further causes cardiac stress leading to fatal arrhythmias. Using a backboard to further control the subject while making sure their respirations are  not impeded gives EMS and officers further control and helps with protection of both the subject and personnel in direct contact. The backboard can also be used to turn the subject on their side if needed for things such as clearing the airway, seizures, etc. Training between both law enforcement and EMS along with protocols, policy and procedures will help ensure proper response and treatment for a subject exhibiting symptoms such as excited delirium.



                                                                  References

1.     ACEP Exited Delirium Task Force. White Paper Report on Excited Delirium Syndrome. ACEP. 2009.
2.     Chan TC, Vilke GM, Neuman T. Restraint position and positional asphyxia. Ann Emer Med. 1997;30(5):578-86.
3.     Fishbain DA, Wetli CV. Cocaine intoxication, delirium and death in a body packer. Ann Emerg Med. 1981; 10:531-532.
4.     Glatter K, Karch SB. Positional Asphyxia: inadequate oxygen, or inadequate theory. Frensic  Sci Int. 2004;141(2-3): 201-2.
5.     Karch SB, Cardiac arrest in cocaine users. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14(1):79-8.
6.     Kraines SH. Bell’s Mania American Journal of Psychiatry; 1934;Vol 91(1), 29-40.
7.     Mash DC, Pablo J, Ouyang Q. Dopamine transport function is elevated in cocaine users. J Neurochem. 2002;81(2):292-300.
8.     Mash DC, Staley JK, Izenwasser S. Seerotonin transporters upregulate with chronic cocaine use. J  Chem Neuroanat. 2000;20(3-4):271-80.
9.     Mash DC, Duque L,  Pablo J. Brain biomarkers for identifying excited delirium as a cause of sudden death. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;190(1-3):e13-9.
10. O’Halloran RL, Lewman LV. Restraint asphyxiation in excited delirium. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1993;14(4):289-95
11. Stratton SJ, Brickett K, Factors associated with sudden deathof individuals requiring restraint for excited delirium. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(3):187-91.
12. Stratton SJ, Rogers C, Green K. Sudden death in individuals in hobble restraints during paramedic transport. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25(5):71-9.
13. Strote J, Range HH. Taser use in restraint-related deaths. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(4):447-50.
14. Sullivan L, Death by excited delirium: Diagnosis or coverup? National Public Radio, All Things Considered. 2007. (Accessed March 22, 2015 athttp//www.npr.org/template/story/story.php?storyid=7608386).
15. Wetli CV, Fishbain DA.  Cocaine-induced psychosis and sudden death in recreational cocaine users. J Forensic SCi. 1985; 30(3): 873-80.
16. Williams RB, Ferrell RB. Excited delirium: Consideration of selected medical and psychiatric issues. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2009;5:61-6.
17. Asia T, Terence A, Henderson S. Excited Delirium. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(1):77-83.
18. Pollanen MS, Chiasson DA, Cairns JT. Unexpected death related to restraint for excited delirium: a retrospective study of deaths in police custody and in the community. CMAJ. 1998;158(12):1603-7.
19. Moller C, Bing O, Heilig M. c-fos expression in the amygdala: in vivo antisense modulation and a role in anxiety. Cell Mol Nerobiol. 1994;14(5):415-23.

20. Johnson MM, david J, Michelhaugh S, Schmidt C, Bannon M. Increased heat shock protein 70 gene expression in the brains of cocaine related fatalities may be reflective of postdrug survival and intervention rather than excited delirium. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(6):1556-4029.